Synothic Problem Free Essay Example, 1750 words

On the other hand, other authors do believe otherwise. This was evident in the statement of Mark Goodacre; according to the writer: â€Å"This way of reading the Gospel is not simply a recent and popular development. It is the way in which they have been read for most of their history. It proceeds in part from an embarrassment that there should be four Gospels in the Bible and not one. If we are to think of ‘gospel truth’ and the reliability of Scripture, there might seem to be a problem in the fact that the first four books in the New Testament announce themselves as the Gospels According to Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. †6 The problems that other scholars are pertaining to are just in reference to the possible questions and emerging explanations between the relationships of the gospels. When thoroughly analyzing the three gospels, they are not similar word per word. They also tell the stories or the events of the life of Jesus in different ways. Since there are 3 different gospels written by 3 different apostles, it is not impossible that, though they see the same things and write about it, there are interpretations and terminologies which would not synch in one way or the other. Even if the gospels are said to be synoptic, or are seen as similar, its writers do have different ways of telling and conveying a story to future readers. We will write a custom essay sample on Synothic Problem or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/pageorder now Another point that should be considered when analyzing the synoptic gospels is the fact that there have been numerous versions of the Bible available to the present generation of scholars. Moreover, the Bible was written in a different language as compared to the languages of today’s Bibles (the translations). 7 The differences and discrepancies found in the synoptic gospels are further backed up by various scholars who believe that these variations are just facts which do not affect the reliability and credibility of the Scriptures. As Bratcher detailed: This allowed the development of critical methodologies for the investigation of Scripture that included a careful and detailed reading of the biblical texts for what they actually said apart from the doctrines that told people what they should mean. This did not deny the authority of the Bible as the inspired word of God. In fact, it affirmed it even more strongly. But it did allow the biblical text to be seen as something more than a repository of timeless and unchanging truths written by the finger of God. 8 The more the scriptures are being questioned, the more these scholars believe that what was written in the text is true.